Connect with us

CK Updates

Hoima Metropolis Stadium Media Tribune to be widened – The Panorama Uganda

Published

on

Hoima Metropolis Stadium Media Tribune to be widened

David GOMBE

Dr Dennis Mugimba, the Chairperson of the AFCON 2027 Uganda Sub-committee for communications has confirmed that Hoima Metropolis Stadium media tribune is to be widened in preparation for the continental showpiece to be co-hosted in East Africa.

In February, the CAF inspection crew led by Dr Christian Emeruwa (Head of Security & Safety) and Stephanie Totokra (Head of Infrastructure) carried out the inspections at host venues for AFCON 2027 and declared that not one of the three internet hosting nations (Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania) was prepared.

In accordance with the report Hoima Metropolis Stadium media services have been beneath CAF requirements whereas addressing the media on Tuesday, Mugimba confirmed that they’re to widened the tribune to fulfill the required CAF ranges.

“The 𝙈𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖 𝙏𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙪𝙣𝙚 𝙖𝙩 𝙃𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙖 𝘾𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙪𝙢 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙬𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 150 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚 𝙧𝙤𝙤𝙢 𝙖𝙩 𝙃𝙤𝙞𝙢𝙖 𝘾𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙎𝙩𝙖𝙙𝙞𝙪𝙢 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙢𝙪𝙢 𝙘𝙖𝙥𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙤𝙛 50 𝙖𝙨 𝙥𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘾𝘼𝙁 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙨 𝙤𝙛 2022. 𝙒𝙚 𝙨𝙝𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙝𝙤𝙬𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙖𝙙𝙙 𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙞𝙩. 𝘼𝙡𝙨𝙤, 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙤𝙤𝙧 𝘼𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙖 𝙬𝙞𝙡𝙡 𝙗𝙚 𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙤 𝙖 𝙢𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙖 𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧.”

𝘾𝘼𝙁 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢 𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙣𝙨 𝙩𝙤 𝙀𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝘼𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖 𝙞𝙣 𝙅𝙪𝙣𝙚 2026 𝙖𝙛𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙁𝙚𝙗𝙧𝙪𝙖𝙧𝙮 𝙫𝙞𝙨𝙞𝙩. 𝙂𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙐𝙜𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙖 𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙚𝙘𝙪𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝘼𝙁𝘾𝙊𝙉 2027 𝙝𝙖𝙥𝙥𝙚𝙣𝙨 𝙞𝙣 𝙐𝙜𝙖𝙣𝙙𝙖 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙀𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝘼𝙛𝙧𝙞𝙘𝙖 𝙖𝙨 𝙖 𝙬𝙝𝙤𝙡𝙚.” Mentioned Mugimba

In the meantime, the federal government has allotted UShs. 91.05 billion to the improve of Hoima Regional Referral Hospital, Masindi Basic Hospital, and Buseruka Well being Centre-III to a capability the place they’ll deal with ICU, accident and emergency care amongothers as per necessities of CAF.

The federal government additionally allotted Shs13.75 billion to Hoima Metropolis (UShs. 6.55 billion) and Masindi Municipality (UShs. 5.1 billion) in the direction of enchancment of sanitation and environmental hygiene providers throughout the match.

CK Updates

US Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Ben Shelton for second Grand Slam title

Published

on

Alexander Zverev celebrates with the US Open trophy

Going into the 2026 season, few people would have backed Zverev to win two Grand Slam tournaments, with the German having already lost three major finals in a career which looked in danger of not living up to expectation.

But injuries to his biggest rivals – Alcaraz missing the French Open and Wimbledon, with Sinner ruled out of the US Open – opened the door for Zverev.

A below-par Zverev scraped through the opening rounds at Flushing Meadows in a series of early-morning finishes, but he gradually improved over a fortnight where he did not play a top-20 opponent until Shelton.

Zverev had not lost to Shelton in their five previous meetings and immediately capitalised on a nervy start by his opponent.

Shelton double-faulted on break point in the first game of the match, handing over the type of initiative that opponents often struggle to wrestle back from Zverev.

Through the strength of his first serve, and his ability to unpick Shelton’s weaker backhand in the baseline exchanges, Zverev rolled through the opening set and clinched it when Shelton hit another double fault on set point.

Zverev continued to patiently draw mistakes from Shelton in the second set, but without being gifted a break when his only opportunity arrived in the fourth game.

Advertisement

He instead showed why he has a strong tie-break record with another nerveless display and, unlike in the 2020 US Open final when he lost from a two-set lead, kept his composure in the pressure moments to secure a commanding victory.

Addressing his team which is led by his father Alexander senior and brother Mischa, Zverev said: “We went 30 years without winning a Grand Slam title and now won two in the span of three months.

“I think God has seen how hard we have worked, how hard we have suffered and how much pain we went through.

“I think 2026 is the outcome of all the years that happened before.”

Continue Reading

CK Updates

Erling Haaland goal: Was Haaland’s derby winner a VAR error?

Published

on

Erling Haaland scores for Man City

With Haaland’s goal settling the match, United were unsurprisingly disappointed by the decision.

“I think it was offside,” said Martinez. “And what I can’t understand is the rules. I want to be calm now, I want to control myself.

“It’s so hard because you lose a derby, you lose three points at home, and every season they’re [referees] coming to our club, they explain for one hour the rules, and they look so confident with that, and then after [there are] five or six people doing these kind of mistakes in the Premier League – it’s unacceptable.

“It’s the best league in the world, you have the best teams in the world, the best players in the world, and now we have to go home with this injustice.”

United boss Carrick also expressed his confusion.

“We put things in place in the game now, we have people in offices with all the screens for this decision,” he said.

“It’s more worrying about if that’s the interpretation of football now. If that’s the interpretation of not interfering in the game now, that’s really worrying for me. It’s a staggering explanation.

Advertisement

“The decision isn’t going to change the season, but it’s had a major impact on the game.”

Wayne Rooney, part of the BBC’s MOTD2 team, said: “Surely it’s offside. Martinez is impacted by Fernandez’s movement, and he is offside.”

Gary Neville said on Sky Sports: “I think we’ll see some sort of apology from the referee’s association, there’s no doubt Fernandez is playing that ball and is trying to put off Martinez. I think it’s one they’ll recognising they got wrong.”

Micah Richards added: “I think it’s been a bad day for referees. They got the Foden decision wrong and the Fernandez decision wrong. I think they got it so wrong but I don’t think it takes anything away from City’s performance.”

Meanwhile, City boss Maresca said: “I think it was onside clearly so it’s good.”

Continue Reading

CK Updates

World Athletics’ stance on Russian athletes ‘won’t change’ – Sebastian Coe

Published

on

Sebastian Coe

World Athletics president Sebastian Coe says the governing body’s stance on sanctions imposed on Russia will not change.

Athletes from Russia and Belarus have been banned from international track and field competition by World Athletics since the country’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

The Russian Athletics Federation has filed a new claim with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) to challenge the sanctions imposed by World Athletics.

But Coe said: “Our position hasn’t changed. This isn’t about politics or passports, it’s about the integrity of competition.”

Russian Athletics says the ongoing sanctions “infringe on the organisation’s rights”, adding they “prevent it from fully representing the interests of Russian athletes on an international level”.

Should the Cas ruling come down in favour of Russian Athletics, the way could be opened for Russian and Belarusian athletes to compete at the next Olympic Games, which will be held in Los Angeles in 2028.

Coe, who won two Olympic gold medals during a celebrated athletics career, has pledged to attend the Cas hearing to help present the case of World Athletics.

Advertisement

Speaking on Sunday at the World Athletics Ultimate Championship in Budapest, the 69-year-old Briton said: “From the age of 18, I believe that every position I’ve taken, whether it was during the creation of the first IOC athletes’ commission or positions I’ve personally taken, it’s about integrity and it’s about competition.

“That matters to me, so our position won’t change.”

Coe added that the issue needed to be “resolved” and that the overall objective was to have a “full complement of people on a global level competing in our sport”.

Russian Athletics executive director Boris Yaryshevsky, in an interview with the Russian TASS news agency last week, criticised Coe’s intention to attend the Cas hearing.

“It is very clear that he has something personal,” said Yaryshevsky.

“He is no longer speaking on behalf of World Athletics as a federation. He is speaking for himself, saying that he personally will go to court to defend this.

“I believe this is simply his personal position, not the position of World Athletics.”

Advertisement

The stance taken by World Athletics differs to that taken by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), as well as the governing bodies of numerous other sports.

The IOC provisionally lifted Russia’s suspension in July, potentially allowing the country to compete at the 2028 Olympics Games in Los Angeles.

Other sporting federations, including World Gymnastics, World Aquatics and World Boxing, have this year removed restrictions on Russian athletes competing.

Some Russian and Belarusian athletes competed as neutrals at both the 2024 Paris Games and this year’s Winter Olympics in Milan.

Continue Reading

Trending

© 2025 - CK Sports UG. All rights reserved.